![]() Some of the stuff in the videos on this thread were a good 3db different on the crappy display speakers !Ĭompletely OT - what goodies did you put into your lunch box?īecause he's saying "what do you think of the differences between these two outputs".Īnd that's a question. I don't even bother to fire up my mains, I just use my display audio and watch the meter tell me how badly mismatched the levels are, of course they sound different. Oh yeah, my new secret weapon for this type of BS is my iPhone SPLnFFT SPL meter app. ![]() He even set up the UAD Ampex ATR102 half track with 1" tape emu, set up the Slate Studer half track with 1/2" tape emu, then completely ignoring this fact stated that you should be careful when doing these kind of comparisons to make sure you use the same width tape on both machines you are comparing, I kid you not. He kept going on about the fact this was an apples to apples comparison and then proceeds to tweak each of the respective plugins differently. ![]() There was a cat (apparently with some platinum - go figure) over on the UAD forum doing a "shootout" between UAD and Slates new virtual studio thingy. I'm really not sure what this is all about, of course I would expect them to sound different, what is the point he is trying to make here ? This guy does 2 different mixes using different processing and calls it a shootout. Man I''m beginning to think the word "shootout" should be banned. For every rule I did hear/read, I broke it just so I could experience the difference because having the experiences (good and bad) were what had the most lasting value. That was part of my point before - before the Internet I did not have all this opinionated noise we have today to get in my way, tempting me to constantly second guess myself I only had time and the desire to try over and over. Learn more about how things work and less about 'tips and tricks'. don't be deterred and instead lose yourself in the learning process while enjoying the process as much as the result. don't like what you hear, so be it, try something else, investigate exactly why you don't like what you hear. So my advice is to keep doing it incessantly. I personally don't think that is something we can watch and read, the watching and reading is just the preparation to start down that path. No one gets good at anything without plenty of failure, failure and frustration are the exact things that helps us get great at what we do well. Just not getting the results I'm looking for, I guess. I'm always making changes in how I'm doing things based on what I see here or there. Well after having read some about mixing in a self-published book by a guy who has a Music Production tutorial channel, and going through all of the "Free" Mixing In Reaper videos plus about 1 1/2 videos of the paid course, I'm not certain what it is I'm supposed to "get" that will make the difference. It's not only about the marketing blabla regarding the "better" sound but the workflow - you have one window, a mixer, and that's it. I don't want to learn Ardour, which might be a cool open source software but not that mature like the other players of the game.Īgain. Their software mixer and REAPER as the DAW "behind" it. My dream would be, they invite Justin to a coffee table and talk about a "fusion" of the best of both worlds. I tried MB some time ago and was impressed about the idea and the outcome we got finishing mixes with it, but also had problems with stability, stupid bugs and I have my personal problem with the choosen Ardour. A little bit of workstyle of the old days if you want. No, not another EQ or compressor plugin on that channel. Harrison wanted to develop a mixing workflow. IMHO some of you got it wrong what it is all about.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |